Kat Madrid

HERE ARE THE PREMISES (FACTUAL PREMISES): All facts and evidences that follow are verifiable. We advise you to personally investigate the validity of our analysis:

Exhibit A:
Ms. Kat Madrid’s Multiply account is www.skyefio.multiply.com

As of NOW and since four years ago or so, Ms. Kat Madrid owns NO OTHER multiply account aside from the one mentioned above. You can verify its contents on the said address to establish the identity of Ms. Kat Madrid beyond reasonable doubt.

Exhibit B:
Cate Orr is accusing Kat Madrid of visiting her multiply website bearing the username Visitor from Katmadrid on July 23, 2010 supposedly. She even posted a screenshot of her multiply page in her BW Forum to prove her point.
See screenshot below courtesy of Ms. Cate Orr herself.

The reason why Cate is averse to Kat’s visit is not clear in her post below the screenshot. May dala daw na gawa-gawang chismis si Kat. Ano naman kaya ‘yun? Di naman niya binanggit kung ano yun.

The point of this investigation however is whether Kat Madrid INDEED visited Cate’s Multiply account or NOT.

Exhibit C:
Ms. Kat Madrid’s official website address is http://katmadrid.net/ notice that the URL is all in SMALL LETTERS.

Exhibit D:
There is no existing Katmadrid multiply account (verify it yourself on the internet)

Exhibit E:
There is no existing VISITOR multiply account (verify it yourself on the internet)

Exhibit F:
There is no existing Visitor from Katmadrid multiply account (verify it yourself on the internet)

Exhibit G:
There is no existing Visitor from Google multiply account (verify it yourself on the internet)

Should there be any accounts created tomorrow or an hour after this article has been posted bearing the usernames in Exhibit D, E, F, G— that is obviously a desperate act of cover up. Besides, who in their right mind would use such LAME usernames as VISITOR and Visitor from Google?

HERE ARE SOME MULTIPLY USER FACTS:

1.No unregistered guest will appear on the guest log and unless VISITOR (as shown in Cate’s forgery) is a registered username itself, it cannot represent an anonymous, unregistered guest.

We have already established that ALL the visitors of Cate Orr’s multiply account on July 23 (EXCEPT for miasara) ARE NON-EXISTENT accounts. Therefore, they couldn’t have entered Cate’s Multiply account.

2.The lay-out and format of Multiply is designed in such a manner that everything is in order and precise measurements. This is automated program and no room for messy lay-outs. Visitors’ logs containing usernames have a uniform lay-out. The boxes or margins around the usernames and pictures of registered account owners that visit another account are THE SAME. No matter how long the username, the multiply control panel automatically compresses the username length to make the boxes REMAIN IN UNIFORM SIZES.

See how Cate FORGED the screenshot below.

What Ms. Orr did was cut and paste the username boxes with no pictures and pasted them on a desired background to create the effect that Visitor from Katmadrid
visited her account. Visitor from Katmadrid however does not exist as we have already established above. She also cut and pasted the VISITOR and Visitor from Google usernames and put them on both sides of Visitor from Katmadrid

However, due to Ms. Orr’s lack of common sense, she overlooked some basic Multiply lay-out. The usernames of Visitor from Katmadrid and Visitor from Google are so LONG that Cate had to extend their boxes way below the programmed spot. Multiply doesn’t widen or lengthen the box to accommodate the entire username, it just automatically adjusts the distance between letters or compress the letters or overlap the usernames.

Check again the screenshots below. That’s a legitimate multiply format from registered Multiply accounts.No uneven margins and no double lines below the picture whatsoever. SINGLE LINE lang ang username in every box.

Notice the lovematchexclusive multiply account that Cate had created for LoveMatch before and the kismetandkisses account. The usernames are too long and instead of extending the size of the box, Multiply automatically compressed the username letters and overlapped it with the next box. The color of the username letters is ALWAYS BLUE, NOT BLACK as shown in Cate’s forgery. Multiply uses Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) in its native site format, hence the boxes’ sizes cannot be altered by an ordinary user or even in an upgraded account.

But NEVERMIND all those glaring facts. Cate Orr’s main intention in FORGING the screenshot was to convince us that her Multiply account has an awesome guest tracker that can track/detect/identify every visiting guest’s location BEFORE he/she came to her multiply account. In this case, Cate wants us all to believe that Kat came from her website www.katmadrid.net before proceeding to Cate’s multiply account.

The thing is, that trick is an IMPOSSIBILITY at the moment. There is NO built-in location tracker or website-referring search engine tracking feature in existence for Multiply users, EVEN for the upgraded accounts. Besides, how can www.katmadrid.net be referred to Cate’s Multiply site when Kat doesn’t have a link of Cate’s Multiply account on her website? Kat has NEVER linked www.katmadrid.net to Cate’s Multiply site.

For example, if I enter Ms. Orr’s multiply account via Google browser, I will NOT register/appear on her visitor’s log. I have to enter her site via my registered multiply account in order for my username to appear in her visitor’s log.Klaro ba ‘yan children?

So, Ms. Orr is the ONLY Multiply user who has that AWESOME guest location tracker. How effing cool is that. Bestfriends siguro sila ng may-ari ng Multiply:?:

Conclusion:

This is really a simple case to solve. Anybody can solve it with eyes closed. There is ONLY ONE CLEAR VERDICT HERE. Cate Orr, in her desperate attempt to solicit sympathy from clueless people and regain her tattered credibility, had committed yet another disgusting transgression on someone else’s rights. She FORGED that screenshot she posted on her BW Forum to dupe people into believing that Kat Madrid has been to her Multiply account to Lurk or whatever. Para nga naman maniwala ang mga taong inaapi na naman siya ng walang kadahilanan, kelangan niyang gumawa ng “ebidensiya” bilang patunay.

You know, her post regarding the forged screenshot seemed harmless enough. Naghihinaing lang naman daw. But the ACT she committed to discredit Kat Madrid, the blatant lie she concocted by creating/forging/photoshopping that screenshot is extremely twisted. Imagine the lengths that she would go to, without remorse— to DESTROY people. Imagine what she can do to unsuspecting individuals?

Talk about publicly hanging yourself by your own tail. Ops. Nag-imbento ako ng sarili kong idiom. Sa tagalog, ginisa ang sarili sa sariling mantika. Teka, anlayo yata. Whatever.

CASE CLOSED.